Today in Landfill Capitalism: bringing a scooter to a knife fight.

Bird Scooter tried to censor a Boing Boing post. So that's going well:

Last month, I published a post discussing the mountains of abandoned Bird Scooters piling up in city impound lots, and the rise of $30 Chinese conversion kits that let you buy a scooter at auction, swap out the motherboard, and turn it into a personal scooter, untethered from the Bird company.

In response, Bird sent us a legal threat of such absurdity that we are publishing it in full, along with a scorching response from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, as a kind of celebration of truly world-class legal foolishness.

In Bird's legal threat, they imply that by linking to a forum in which the existence of conversion kits was under discussion, I had violated the anti-trafficking clauses of Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, the 1998 law that limits the dissemination of "circumvention tools" that bypass access controls for copyrighted works -- for example, tools that let you extract the video from an encrypted DVD.

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Tags: , , , , ,

17 Responses:

  1. MattyJ says:

    So nobody at Bird bothered to google "Cory Doctorow" to maybe find out if that's perhaps the second to last guy on Earth you'd want to pick that kind of fight with?

  2. Derpatron9000 says:

    I long for the day these when fools get their comeuppance.

  3. o.o says:

    Nobody noticed that Bird's corporate counsel is named Linda Kwak?

  4. robert_ says:

    In the future it will be illegal to point out that a company's business model is either doomed or inherently harmful to wider society.

  5. Jeff Allen says:

    Normally, the rule is "never read the comments", but if you're into puns, reading the comment thread on that BoingBoing post would be well worth your time.

  6. Jon says:

    FYI: "Lime halts scooter service in Switzerland after possible software glitch throws users off mid-ride"

  7. Chas. Owens says:

    Normally I defend Bird, but this is indefensible. The company put out a statement throwing the attorney under the bus:

    In the quest for curbing illegal activities related to our vehicles, our legal team overstretched and sent a takedown request related to the issue to a member of the media. This was our mistake and we apologize to Cory Doctorow.

    • jwz says:

      Hey, be fair, I'm sure that like literally every other aspect of their business, their lawyer was a lowest-bid contractor that they found on Fiver.

      • Kyle Huff says:

        Fiver! Thank you. I was trying to look up a hilarious comedy bit about Fiver the other day but couldn't remember the name.
        In this case, I was wondering if you procure fake legal services through

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. But if you provide a fake email address, I will likely assume that you are a troll, and not publish your comment.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <s> <strike> <strong> <img src="" width="" height="" style=""> <iframe src="" class=""> <video src="" class="" controls="" loop="" muted="" autoplay="" playsinline=""> <div class=""> <blink> <tt> <u>, or *italics*.

  • Previously