Without exploring the etic/emic dichotomy, at least taking a nod to Searle, and complaining about some historic fact or another I just can’t take it seriously as tenure-track academese.
Accordig to this, robots that are both human-shaped and animal-shaped cannot be functional; and robots that are human-shaped and animal-shaped and god-shaped all at once cannot be functional. Also, there are godlike robots that are not human-shaped nor animal-shaped nor functional.
Without exploring the etic/emic dichotomy, at least taking a nod to Searle, and complaining about some historic fact or another I just can’t take it seriously as tenure-track academese.
Accordig to this, robots that are both human-shaped and animal-shaped cannot be functional; and robots that are human-shaped and animal-shaped and god-shaped all at once cannot be functional. Also, there are godlike robots that are not human-shaped nor animal-shaped nor functional.
Missing the "furries" tag as usual.
I think they meant this one.
Wow, they'll let people make a Venn diagram of anything these days.