This thread escalated quickly

Previously, previously, previously, previously, previously, previously.

Tags: , ,

9 Responses:

  1. Aaron says:

    This illustrates well how phenomena that appear to be exponentials are really just sigmoids, or something else, and why there's no "singularity."

    • I mean everything returns to zero eventually, right?

    • japhomatic says:

      Agreed. Also, was looking at the overall timeline and thinking, "...the age of transistors in the 1950s, check; the oversold claims of AI, logic programming and lisp machines in the 70s/80s, check; Kurzweil begins writing books, check..."

  2. Kyle Huff says:

    Nominative determinism.

  3. GM says:

    You forgot to tag this as 'autological'.

  4. Stephen says:

    I thought that last image was going to be the Ngram of: .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. But if you provide a fake email address, I will likely assume that you are a troll, and not publish your comment.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <s> <strike> <strong> <img src="" width="" height="" style=""> <iframe src="" class=""> <video src="" class="" controls="" loop="" muted="" autoplay="" playsinline=""> <div class=""> <blink> <tt> <u>, or *italics*.

  • Previously