Fuck the Super Bowl.

Here, read these, and then let's never speak of it again:

  • The Farce of the Super Bowl Deal

    [...] the document which, it was revealed in January, allowed the NFL to roll into San Francisco and rack up a $5.3 million (and, as of press time, growing) bill for city-provided police, transit, and cleanup services.

    After all, for these same services, the city of Santa Clara -- which is hosting the game at Levi's Stadium, the San Francisco 49ers' new $1.3 billion privately funded palace -- managed to secure $3.6 million up front from the Super Bowl Host Committee, the collection of local civic and business leaders tasked with bringing the Big Game to the Bay Area.

    With still-fresh memories of the 2013 America's Cup, when the so-called "Super Bowl of yachting" arrived with promises of a cash bonanza but set sail after sticking local taxpayers with a $11.5 million bill, they're fair questions: Why couldn't San Francisco do the same? And who's responsible for this particular fumble? [...]

    Lee exited the supervisors' chambers without ever answering Peskin, whose attempt to ask a follow-up -- the same question as before, actually -- was rebuffed by Board of Supervisors President London Breed. [...]

    Far from a "public subsidy" for the country's richest professional sports organization, as a budget analysts' report called it, being Super Bowl City comes with free concerts and free events, a gift for the public.

  • More Hidden Super Bowl Costs: SFMTA Workers Asked To 'Volunteer' On The Clock

    As taxpayer costs related to Super Bowl City continue to increase, we learn today that at least one city department is working hard to keep expenses off the books. SFMTA officials, it seems, have asked employees to "volunteer" as "ambassadors" for Super Bowl City. This "volunteering" would be done during work hours, on the clock, and the employees would be paid by SFMTA. Costs associated with this volunteer work are not included in city officials' $5.3 million (and growing) estimated bill to taxpayers for Super Bowl 50 celebrations, however, allowing overall costs to appear lower than they really are.

  • Why is Muni putting up "traffic" cameras in locations where there will be no cars?

    New cameras, to be precise, aimed at the street between First Street and the Embarcadero, the area that will in a few weeks be closed down to traffic to make way for the Super Bowl and the "Super Bowl City" "fan village" [...]

    They're not even "security cameras" -- they're traffic cameras, according to SFTMA spokesman Paul Rose, and are meant to keep an eye on buses and trains, not people. Nevertheless, privacy advocates aren't convinced, and fear the cameras could fall victim to mission creep. [...]

    "If these cameras are solely for traffic purposes, there needs to be an enforceable policy that strictly limits their use for that purpose," said Matt Cagle, policy attorney for technology and civil liberties at the American Civil Liberties Union. "The risk here, as with so many other surveillance technologies, is that the cameras will remain up after the Super Bowl is long over, and will be used for purposes beyond just traffic control."

  • Scott Wiener goes after homeless people in tents

    In what homeless advocates call a "cruel" move, Sup. Scott Wiener is asking city departments to crack down on homeless people who are living on the sidewalks in tents.

    The El Niño rains have brought a proliferation of tent cities along strips like Division Street, which is also under a highway and more protected. There are some in Wiener's district, too.

    So he's written to the police chief, the fire chief, the director of public works, the director of public health, the head of human services and the mayor's homeless coordinator and asked, "assuming the availability of shelter beds, what will be done to remove illegal tent encampments from our streets .... Or will the law continue to be ignored as it is being ignored today?"

  • El Niño is a public health crisis

    People living on our streets are at high risk for pneumonia or of dying from exposure. On a recent outreach, our volunteer reported that everyone she came in contact with was drenched and so were their belongings. She could not help but notice a lot of people were barefoot or wearing soaked socks.

    The Super Bowl is around the corner, and so sweeps are even more common than usual. According to one dripping young woman, the Department of Public Works and the police did a sweep of her encampment at 4th and Harrison at 6am -- during the downpour. She and her group were told that they need to "move along" until after the Stupid Bowl events and that an area that is considered a "safe zone" is at Bryant and 7th, which so happens to be the location of the county jail.

    Meanwhile a bunch of dry areas have been fenced off in the past two weeks. They are under freeways, away from businesses and residential areas, but off limits to those seeking shelter. In the middle of the rains, there are empty spaces where large encampments were just last week, enclosed with fences topped with razor blades. Meanwhile most homeless people are asking and searching for where they can go without getting harassed. That seems to be the question of the month.

  • Broke-Ass Stuart: Occupy The Super Bowl -- Facebook event

    Mayor Ed Lee told the homeless they "have to leave" for the Super Bowl. Join the Coalition on Homelessness as we protest the mayor's unjust plan and demand immediate housing for our city's unhoused residents. Meet up is at 4:30 in front of Sinbad's on Embacadero next to the Ferry Building. We are going to set up a tent city, with plenty of visuals next to the superbowl city. Bring signs and banners and cardboard cut-outs of houses. And bring tents if you don't mind them getting confiscated.

    Homeless Statistics:

    • There's 1 shelter bed for every 6 homeless
    • There's an 8,000 person long wait for housing
    • 3,300 Children make up SF's homeless
    • 61% have disabilities
    • 11,000 citations were given to homeless for resting in SF last year

    Superbowl-Related Statistics:

    • 25% of the costs for Superbowl ads would be enough to end homelessness in SF (Each 30-second Superbowl ad costs 5 million.)
    • The $5 million cost to SF to host the Superbowl would house 500 homeless people.
    • SFPD is responsible for clearing out homeless people for the Super Bowl by giving them citations which are already up 30% from last year.

  • Civic Center Super Bowl Statue Also Vandalized, Now Reads 'Sup Bro 50'.

  • Vandalized Super Bowl statues, ranked.

  • I'm a professional San Francisco nightlife writer, and I want to slit my delicate, ladylike wrists in a fit of melodramatic pique.

    Yes, yes, the homeless are being herded, the skyscrapers defaced, our streets are clogged, and our tax money is being wasted. But you wanna know the worst thing about the Super Bowl plopping its nacho-stained Walmart sweatpants down on our fair city? The horrific "official parties." They are so awful!

    Look, when Coldplay is your halftime act it can only go downhill from there, but I didn't think it could go this far down. We are entering a bottomless pit of tacky that literally gouges my eyeballs into black holes of abhorrence with each successive Facebook invitation. My Bizarro World favorite so far? The 2016 Maxim Party, "in a class all its own as the #1 most sought after event. Maxim is creating a premium ultra lounge featuring: concert sound, theatrical lighting & effects, full LED video walls and risers for exclusive VIP Tables on different levels."

    GUYS THEY ARE GONNA HAVE TABLES ON DIFFERENT LEVELS! Where will the innovation end? VIP tables (on different levels!) run you $8,500 -- $25,000. Oh, and Paul McCartney might be there. Thanks for ruining everything!

  • Area Surrounding Levi's Stadium To Be Renamed San Francisco

    Everything about the information above suggests that the event is taking place in San Francisco. [...] In light of complaints, a local organization, the Santa Clara Association of Merchants, has drawn up plans to reincorporate the area within a half-mile radius of Levi's Stadium as a new city called San Francisco. It wouldn't be the first time a state has more than one city by the same name. [...]

    But what about fans who already booked hotel rooms in the original San Francisco? Johnson says they can rely on the Bay Area's excellent public-transportation system to get to the big game in a safe and timely manner.

    "Let's say you're in Fisherman's Wharf in the old San Francisco. You just hop on the F streetcar, skip over to the Embarcadero Muni station, get on the N train, take that to the Caltrain station, ride Caltrain down to the Mountain View station, transfer to the VTA Light Rail and take in the scenery as the light rail whisks you to the stadium. Boom -- simple. Just three and a half hours door to door, then another quick hour in the security line at the stadium, and you're done."

Previously, previously, previously, previously.

Tags: , , , ,

23 Responses:

  1. Geoff Smith says:

    Ugh. I pretty much plan on holing up the week of super bowl to not deal with its super bullshit.

  2. Dave Polaschek says:

    When the NFL took over Minneapolis back in 1992, I went to Seattle for vacation. Trying to decide where I'll be taking my next January vacation in about a year. Running away seems like the only sane choice.

  3. Jeff Bell says:

    The road to 'L'

  4. nooj says:

    You're already second hit for "fuck the super bowl"!

    You will be pleased to know the #1 slot is a blog post written by "Protoclown".

  5. nooj says:

    Now we know why all those face reco cameras--variously billed as "traffic" or "red light" or "security" cameras--have been going up so easily in the face of public outcry. It's because the FBI and DoJ have been pushing for increased surveillance tools behind our backs for decades! Yay, the system works!

    • MattyJ says:

      Maybe the heroes taking care of these signs can later take care of the new 'traffic' cameras.

    • I think the Fisherman's Wharf one was modded to SPERM OWL, but it had been partially repaired to SUPERM OWL when I went by this afternoon.

    • Paul N says:

      Wow. This sounds more intense than when Prince came to the DNA Lounge.

    • Lachlan Smith says:

      Okay, the fact that he's holding an assault rife to begin with is pretty disturbing (what, does a pistol not hold enough bullets? Or not fire them fast enough? WHY DO YOU NEED TO MOW DOWN SO MANY PEOPLE?), but...
      Anyone else know why he needs a suppressor on his assault rifle?

      Because there are two reasons I can think of for why he'd want a suppressor, and neither are good:

      - He plans on firing while he's still in a crowd of people (and he doesn't want them to experience hearing or vision loss). In which case, maybe you shouldn't be shooting if you're surrounded by innocent civilians? He's already wearing shades and hearing protection, so it's not for him. Or

      - He wants to be sure that it's harder to determine where the shots are coming from when he **does** start firing, so that whoever he's firing at doesn't know where he is, people don't know where to run to seek cover, and the person he's shooting at is more likely to fire wildly in blind terror?

      Who gave this man a gun? No- sorry... Who gave this man at least two guns?
      Everything about this is unsettling.

      • nooj says:

        why does he need a flash suppressor?

        I forget the specifics, but IIRC police use flash suppressors so they (the police) are not temporarily blinded (as much) while firing. It's not to maintain cover.

        why is he holding an assault rifle to begin with?

        A long gun is MUCH more accurate than a pistol, especially in a tense situation (when aiming is a big problem). An officer armed with a rifle will probably shoot fewer people on accident, and fire fewer shots.

        I have no idea why he's visible to the public. That's pretty fucked up.

        Who gave this man a gun?

        IIRC the Super Bowl is secured as tightly as a Presidential visit. Lord knows why. Money, I suppose.

        • wc says:

          guys,

          These Counterstrike suited soldiers are fully out, visible, and kicking it all around SBCity. Saw at least 4 on Sunday.

        • Jonathan says:

          An officer armed with a rifle will probably shoot fewer people on accident, and fire fewer shots.

          Sounds legit, but do stats support this?

          • nooj says:

            Unclear. I've tried to look them up, but getting reliable stats on officer shootings is impossible. Half of what I can find is lies probably "massaged", and it's only a tenth of what I think is out there.

  6. crtxc says:

    "privatize profit; socialize debt"/ go under the OS, hit the metal/ lift that pretty skirt/ there is no defence you pagan jerk/ we'll steal your ideas, anything yes and no can store/ assault keyboard buffers and have DMA fun/ There is no place to run/ we'll force you to join our religion/ we'll force our will/ your weak now, we'll take your land/ we'll smile and hold your hand/ we'll privatize profit; we'll enslave by debt/ we'll own you yet. Fret. "hey, lets watch the stupor bowl"

  7. My plan is to lane-split my bike through the gridlocked traffic as much as possible, just for spite.

  8. Marcos Dione says:

    Here, some more reasons to love professional sports:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcwJt4bcnXs

  9. Anonytrace says:

    Higher paid players getting injured for the team. Jock O'Rama at it's best.