"And that's how we can go from a chess computer to the apocalypse in just four years."
8 Responses:
-
Recent Posts
- This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- DNA Lounge: Wherein we reach a CENTURY
- jwz mixtape 239
- Safety Equipment
- Mail search y u slow
- Is this not a reasonable form of ID?
- DNA Lounge: Wherein DNA Pizza is Twelve!
- FAC SEVENTY THREE, FORTY
- lp0 on fire, retry
- Mr. Incognito
- Remote updates of iPads
- March Fourth. Fourth March.
- AI Is Magic
- Picard
- This week in Zuckerhell
- Time Slider
- RealNetworks
- Sea of Segments
- The Dream of the Nineties is Still Alive
Recent Comments
- Derpatron9000 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- MattyJ on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Chris W. on Mr. Incognito
- Nate on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Emma H on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Colm Kennedy on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Karellen on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Nik on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Ben on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Derpatron9000 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Adede on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Narr on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Narr on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Doctor Memory on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- CSL3 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- jwz on jwz mixtape 239
- o.o on jwz mixtape 239
- reboots on Safety Equipment
- bq Mackintosh on Safety Equipment
- Nate on Mail search y u slow
- David K on Safety Equipment
- mattl on Remote updates of iPads
- Tyler on Safety Equipment
- jwz on Safety Equipment
Archives
- 2023 (86)
- 2022 (367)
- 2021 (389)
- 2020 (473)
- 2019 (376)
- 2018 (525)
- 2017 (583)
- 2016 (518)
- 2015 (633)
- 2014 (709)
- 2013 (728)
- December 2012 (65)
- November 2012 (59)
- October 2012 (95)
- September 2012 (87)
- August 2012 (76)
- July 2012 (50)
- June 2012 (52)
- May 2012 (65)
- April 2012 (73)
- March 2012 (134)
- February 2012 (55)
- January 2012 (59)
- December 2011 (54)
- 2011 (767)
- 2010 (725)
- 2009 (590)
- 2008 (519)
- 2007 (374)
- 2006 (505)
- 2005 (578)
- 2004 (524)
- 2003 (634)
- 2002 (496)
Previously
well the slow-mo appears to show the robot cheating by making a decision after the human. But, yea we're doomed
Bet it can't recognize lizard or spock.
I don't see the significance of this. The camera reads what your play (move) is, decides what the winning move is, then executes that.
If there was some machine learning or proof of predicting the winning play - that would be worthy of note.
Am I missing something? What's the novelty here? Is it that someone programmed a camera to recognize human hand gestures?
Yes, what's the significant of teaching an unfeeling hunk of metal and sand to understand your hand motions and respond accordingly?
You are living in the future and squandering your sense of wonder.
Your condescension is unfortunate. It blocks your reasoning.
Instead, take a moment to understand my comment: This is nothing new, gesture recognition has been done for quite some time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gesture_recognition
The significance you missed here : for the lulz.
I stand corrected...lulz indeed.
It turns out our cognitive faculties for rock-paper-scissors crap are compared to the machine. It's kind of wonderfully disheartening.
When will the USARPS League allow nonhuman competitors? And what kind of performance enhancements will humans try in order to compete?