"Whoa."
11 Responses:
-
Recent Posts
- This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- DNA Lounge: Wherein we reach a CENTURY
- jwz mixtape 239
- Safety Equipment
- Mail search y u slow
- Is this not a reasonable form of ID?
- DNA Lounge: Wherein DNA Pizza is Twelve!
- FAC SEVENTY THREE, FORTY
- lp0 on fire, retry
- Mr. Incognito
- Remote updates of iPads
- March Fourth. Fourth March.
- AI Is Magic
- Picard
- This week in Zuckerhell
- Time Slider
- RealNetworks
- Sea of Segments
- The Dream of the Nineties is Still Alive
Recent Comments
- Derpatron9000 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- MattyJ on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Chris W. on Mr. Incognito
- Nate on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Emma H on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Colm Kennedy on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Karellen on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Nik on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Ben on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Derpatron9000 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Adede on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- Narr on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Narr on This makes sense, because Large Language Models are also a petroleum product.
- Doctor Memory on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- CSL3 on "Will You Help Me Repair My Door?"
- jwz on jwz mixtape 239
- o.o on jwz mixtape 239
- reboots on Safety Equipment
- bq Mackintosh on Safety Equipment
- Nate on Mail search y u slow
- David K on Safety Equipment
- mattl on Remote updates of iPads
- Tyler on Safety Equipment
- jwz on Safety Equipment
Archives
- 2023 (86)
- 2022 (367)
- 2021 (389)
- 2020 (473)
- 2019 (376)
- 2018 (525)
- 2017 (583)
- 2016 (518)
- 2015 (633)
- 2014 (709)
- 2013 (728)
- 2012 (870)
- March 2012 (134)
- February 2012 (55)
- January 2012 (59)
- December 2011 (54)
- November 2011 (67)
- October 2011 (72)
- September 2011 (62)
- August 2011 (70)
- July 2011 (53)
- June 2011 (84)
- May 2011 (62)
- April 2011 (67)
- March 2011 (103)
- 2011 (767)
- 2010 (725)
- 2009 (590)
- 2008 (519)
- 2007 (374)
- 2006 (505)
- 2005 (578)
- 2004 (524)
- 2003 (634)
- 2002 (496)
Am, the first video I saw of it I thought they were projecting the correction image onto the person's face. Here they're obviously just doing it on the computer, which is far less interesting.
Why is the forehead not included?
yeah tracking facial features in realtime and mapping new textures onto them also in realtime with reasonable lighting is really just uninteresting. i'm sure it's something you did this morning before making breakfast.
I agree with you, facial tracking has been done. Thanks for the support!
[...] Substitution via jwz. Kyle writes - Working on an idea with Arturo Castro I feel like “good” blending looks [...]
A couple related problems: this post and the Amon Tobin post appear merged on the blog page, comments are disabled on the Tobin post, and the LJ mirror of the Tobin post doesn't link back to the original post.
Fixed, thanks. Don't know what went wrong with LJ, and mostly don't care.
Random: I was sufficiently bored lately to re-read the entire archives from 2002 through 2006. 1. Are you still interested in alternative space launch solutions? You haven't mentioned space elevators in some time. 2. Do blog posts still end up on gruntle? I re-read gruntle earlier this year and couldn't remember any recent stuff there. I suppose gruntle itself suggests not, but I was wondering why. It was sort of a self selected best-of. 3. Have you read Neal Stephenson's new book? I heard it's not as good, but possibly shorter.
0:you are a crazy person. That could be toxic. You may need to eat some charcoal now or something.
1: I am interested in a hypothetical future where humanity has a space program of some kind, yes.
2: Not really. I had been archiving my year-end wrap-ups there, but that always seemed kind of out of place. I should probably make some other kind of index for the less-ephemeral blog posts, but I'm not sure how to organize that yet.
3. I haven't. I made it 200 pages into the Ben Franklin one and gave up on him because *nothing* had happened yet. He's really the poster child for "why writers need editors." someone has to say "stop!" at some point.
Re: 3 - oh thank god, it wasn't just me.
At some point my interest level had devolved to the point that I was reading two pages, falling asleep, and having to re-read 1.5 pages the next night because they hadn't stuck in my memory. About a month in, it occurred to me that this was an unsustainable pace for a 1000+ page book.
I was recently tempted to give it a go again, but... then I wasn't.
0: I'll go for chelation, stat.
1: Good to know. Did you see SpaceX's latest? Still just rockets, but not throwing them away every flight. I work on reusable sounding rockets, which is similar but on a smaller scale.
2. Oh ah.
3. Baroque is a long set of books, and Ben Franklin isn't even a major character, which shows how long it goes. Anathem wasn't nearly as bad, and is actually scifi, but the ending is entirely "I have a science-y idea and I'm going to use my book to explain it, even though it makes for some boring dialogue." This new one Reamde is supposed to be more like the older books. I'll probably read it on the plane this weekend.
4. I'm vacationing in SF on Monday through Wednesday, and unfortunately I'm not into goth or metal. Anything else going on you think is interesting?
3. "It wasn't nearly as bad as the last one" is just about the only review I hear of his stuff lately, so why would I bother?
4. I'm afraid not...