10 Responses:

1. shephi says:

   13 years ago at 2:50 pm

   closing all the dangling parens left in the wake of the emoticon infestation on the internet, one step at a time (:)

   • pete23 says:

     13 years ago at 3:02 pm

     surely you need to retroactively open them? and by need, i mean... ach...

     this is one of those things which establishes perpetual motion in the rightwrongometer.

2. flipping_hades says:

   13 years ago at 10:59 pm

   How long before someone gets the elisp-in-javascript and javascript-in-elisp implementations hooked up N levels deep?

   • lionsphil says:

     13 years ago at 10:57 am

     You're stuck in a time-loop. See the first "previously".

     • flipping_hades says:

       13 years ago at 11:45 pm

       I fail to see the what you're pointing out (yes, I've read that one too), unless you're trying to get an infinite comment regress going..

       • lionsphil says:

         13 years ago at 12:49 am

         Never mind.

   • waider says:

     13 years ago at 11:31 am

     (error "Lisp nesting exceeds `max-lisp-eval-depth'")

     • flipping_hades says:

       13 years ago at 11:46 pm

       pshaw. That limit's gotta be a constant somewhere in emacs. We have 64-bit addressing now - we should be able to nest them at least a couple of dozen deep.

       • kehoea says:

         13 years ago at 10:50 am

         It's a variable, called, startlingly enough, `max-lisp-eval-depth'. With

         (let ((max-lisp-eval-depth most-positive-fixnum))
...)

         I get a core dump at 162081 recursive calls on this 64-bit machine; it's a lot sooner if the recursive function makes any binding (most relevantly, if it takes any arguments; for the non-Emacs-Lisp people, let me draw your attention to the fact that dynamic scope sucks).

3. anktastic says:

   13 years ago at 8:17 pm

   Sorry, but I don't get it - what should that code bit show? That the implementation is slow?