15 Responses:
-
Recent Posts
- jwz mixtape 216
- Can't stop thinking about this sign
- Masks
- DNA Lounge: Wherein DNA Lounge face masks are back in stock
- How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Screens burn holes through our brains and shrivel our genitals.
- 100 days of lonely SF bars
- DNA Lounge: Wherein we want your art on our walls.
- AVOID SPIKES
- Nazi Bronies
- Broken images on ye olde blogge
- Gimmes, Ghosts and Dims. SF 2024!
- The Line Is Pleased
- No lack of documentation
- A fine is a price.
- Dazzle is very in right now
- SOMA Nature Walk
- "Behold, the Apple Pro Stand of ham holders"
- "So this is the famous JavaScript!"
- Burn ES&S to the ground
Recent Comments
- jwz on Masks
- DMW on Masks
- Dude on Masks
- Jim Salsman on 100 days of lonely SF bars
- Elusis on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Zach Fine on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- bibulb on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- k3ninho on Screens burn holes through our brains and shrivel our genitals.
- k3ninho on 100 days of lonely SF bars
- dzm on 100 days of lonely SF bars
- pgib on Broken images on ye olde blogge
- formant on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- xrayspx on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Jim on 100 days of lonely SF bars
- Jim on Screens burn holes through our brains and shrivel our genitals.
- margaret on Nazi Bronies
- Robert on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Landa on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Glaurung on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- the hatter on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Joseph Shelby on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- David Glover on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- Joseph Shelby on How does one rip a DVD on a Mac these days?
- dzm on 100 days of lonely SF bars
Archives
- 2020 (203)
- 2019 (376)
- 2018 (525)
- 2017 (583)
- 2016 (518)
- 2015 (633)
- 2014 (709)
- 2013 (728)
- 2012 (870)
- 2011 (767)
- 2010 (725)
- May 2010 (42)
- April 2010 (67)
- March 2010 (133)
- February 2010 (48)
- January 2010 (71)
- December 2009 (65)
- November 2009 (54)
- October 2009 (65)
- September 2009 (71)
- August 2009 (26)
- July 2009 (51)
- June 2009 (32)
- May 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (28)
- March 2009 (83)
- February 2009 (58)
- January 2009 (28)
- 2008 (519)
- 2007 (374)
- 2006 (505)
- 2005 (578)
- 2004 (524)
- 2003 (634)
- 2002 (496)
Better in theory.
That is both awesome and sad. I can't decide which it is more of. My awesome-sad needle is swaying wildly. It may lose structural integrity.
In retrospect, a propulsion system that can potentially throw easily-shattered blades at high speeds in random directions didn't allow the giant bladder of helium in the middle to be the failsafe they were hoping for.
Er. Given that the helicopters fell off the airframe first, I don't think it made much difference.
Hell, it twists so much it could well have ripped the balloon itself.
Beat me to it.
Did they really need to build one to work out that it wouldn't work? Replacing the helicopters with purpose built caged fans might have worked a bit better...
You know, I don't even want to think about the control system for it and the many points of failure in trying to make one human control four helicopters that he probably can't even see.
The human was in the rear, port-side helicopter.
Where do I sign??
Wild.
Before I worked on water-ships my "lottery dream" was to build a zeppelin and sail around the globe with whomever wanted to come along..scattering our ballast of silver dollars upon the people below (yes, I stole the idea from C. Montgomery Burns...) I wouldn't spend powerball cash on a zeppelin now, but they still fascinate me. Maybe I could hitch a ride on yours?
A company called AeroLift built something they called the Cyclocrane: rotated the lifting body for stability using four gimbaled engines , crew operated from a cab slung below the body.
They didn't go anywhere with the idea - got to the tethered flight-test stage, ran into development problems, ran out of cash.
Pity - it could have been cheaper to operate than a helicopter, was quieter, able to haul around comparable loads in an external sling.