The plaintiff, Janine Sugawara, alleged that she had only recently learned to her dismay that said "berries" were in fact simply brightly-colored cereal balls, and that although the product did contain some strawberry fruit concentrate, it was not otherwise redeemed by fruit. She sued, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated consumers who also apparently believed that there are fields somewhere in our land thronged by crunchberry bushes.
Say it ain't so, Cap'n.
Reasonable Consumer Would Know "Crunchberries" Are Not Real, Judge Rules
Tags: doomed
Current Music: Duchess Says -- In Serial ♬
7 Responses:
I think she was smoking more than crunchberries to file that suit....
I think she was smoking Smurfberries.
The crunchberries taste like crunchberries.
Does this mean that grapes don't contain any nuts?
Next someone will sue because spaghetti doesn't actually grow on trees...
Of course spaghetti grows on trees. I saw it on TV, and the BBC no less which is a
[[WP:RS]]Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me for four years running...