8 Responses:

1. xinit says:

   14 years ago at 7:01 pm

   They re-thought the idea of using torrents? Excellent.

   • xinit says:

     14 years ago at 7:03 pm

     Apparently not... good to see someone's filled in the gap.

2. omni_ferret says:

   14 years ago at 8:14 pm

   Someone documented how they got them last year before any torrents were posted.

   I expect the guy who did them unofficially last year to do it again. Glancing through the files on these, I notice duplicates with truncated filenames.

   Not that I'm complaining.

   • ghewgill says:

     14 years ago at 10:41 am

     To avoid duplicating work, I'm not planning on doing a 2009 torrent at this time. However, I am seeding the 2009 torrent on the same high speed link that I've used in past years, which should be helpful.

     • omni_ferret says:

       14 years ago at 5:35 pm

       Hiya! I thought you did last year's after another one surfaced, & I hoped you were just waiting for some official "we are not posting a torrent" announcement.

       Thanks for the torrent tracker, seeding, & setting up last year's!

3. editer says:

   14 years ago at 12:30 pm

   Will you offer six-word reviews?

   • jwz says:

     14 years ago at 12:52 pm

     Yes. "Nearly all of these bands suck."

     • editer says:

       14 years ago at 1:05 pm

       Touchè.

       Maybe my ear is less refined than yours, but I'm finding most of them at least listenable, if not actually good. Of course quite a few of them do suck.