Previously.
Maybe I need an "and people say I'm hard to shop for" tag.
Yes. Yes you do.
To this casual observer, the intersection of any two of "perversions", "toys", "robots", "music" and "art" would work just as well.
I can't tell you how much easier those "previously" links would be to put in if LJ let me do tag intersections like that.
Doesn't look like LJ will be letting you do a lot of things.
It's a little surprising that they can do a union but no intersection, yeah.
You mean to say you can't build one of those out of a mannequin and a bunch of plumbing fixtures?
It's a bit of a stretch to say this is on-topic but, have you seen this:
Is that the new Microsoft SenseCam? Sweet!
"The outlook doesn't look good." - Meant primarily from an outside (and on-looking) perspective, too.
['Scary', to say the least; ..is this 2009 for us?]
http://www.battlestarprops.com/ may offer even more temptations for things you wish people would buy for you.
Maybe I need an "and people say I'm hard to shop for" tag.
Yes. Yes you do.
To this casual observer, the intersection of any two of "perversions", "toys", "robots", "music" and "art" would work just as well.
I can't tell you how much easier those "previously" links would be to put in if LJ let me do tag intersections like that.
Doesn't look like LJ will be letting you do a lot of things.
It's a little surprising that they can do a union but no intersection, yeah.
You mean to say you can't build one of those out of a mannequin and a bunch of plumbing fixtures?
It's a bit of a stretch to say this is on-topic but, have you seen this:
Is that the new Microsoft SenseCam? Sweet!
"The outlook doesn't look good." - Meant primarily from an outside (and on-looking) perspective, too.
['Scary', to say the least; ..is this 2009 for us?]
http://www.battlestarprops.com/ may offer even more temptations for things you wish people would buy for you.