25 Responses:

1. four says:

   16 years ago at 5:21 pm

   viral marketing

   • elliterati says:

     16 years ago at 5:25 pm

     Duh.

2. bdu says:

   16 years ago at 5:29 pm

   Second question: Swap Maggie Gyllenhaal for Katie Holmes as Rachel, will it work?

   • dr_memory says:

     16 years ago at 8:11 pm

     It cannot possibly be worse. "Batman Begins" came to a screeching halt every time Holmes opened her mouth.

     • bdu says:

       16 years ago at 8:19 pm

       I don't disagree, but surely she must have some fans somewhere. I personally thought her character could have been more or less cut out of the movie entirely, regardless of the quality (or lack thereof) of her performance.

       • jwz says:

         16 years ago at 8:25 pm

         But she had to be in the movie to prove that Bruce is a heterosexual.

         • bdu says:

           16 years ago at 8:35 pm

           Tom Cruise jokes are soooo last year.

           • benediktus says:

             16 years ago at 12:05 am

             you want placenta with that?

             • lordmuck says:

               16 years ago at 1:19 am

               Mmm. Patè.

           • dariens_haircut says:

             16 years ago at 7:03 am

             When did that stop anybody?

3. abates says:

   16 years ago at 5:31 pm

   Holy newspaper defacement, Batman!

4. ultranurd says:

   16 years ago at 5:49 pm

   I don't think Ledger is going to have to try very hard to make me like his version of Joker more than Nicholson's. Definitely looking forward to the release.

   • dojothemouse says:

     16 years ago at 6:11 pm

     Fortunately, you can still watch Jack Nicholson playing the same role in any of his other movies.

     • joel says:

       16 years ago at 1:47 am

       dojothemouse wins!

5. temp_revenge says:

   16 years ago at 6:19 pm

   I predict that this shall rock thy face right off.

6. ultranurd says:

   16 years ago at 6:29 pm

   The un-Jokered four pages are at http://thegothamtimes.com/.

7. ladykalessia says:

   16 years ago at 6:56 pm

   I would laugh for days if all of those "rash of clown sightings" photos turn out to be Juggalo pictures ganked from Flickr and MySpace under CC.

   BWAAHAHA.

   • effbot says:

     16 years ago at 1:23 am

     They have their own photo site, with more clowns than you'll ever need:

     http://www.rorysdeathkiss.com/

     (e.g. the last one on that page is "Anarchists galore" from the "3 ring circus" section).

     • ladykalessia says:

       16 years ago at 8:35 am

       You know, on some level this is even MORE disturbing than Juggalos. Gah.

8. albino_minako says:

   16 years ago at 10:02 am

   *squeak*

9. webmaven says:

   16 years ago at 10:11 am

   is at http://whysoserious.com

   • webmaven says:

     16 years ago at 10:13 am

     Note that I found it from the 'correction' at the bottom-right of page 2.

10. kencf0618 says:

    16 years ago at 2:58 pm

    Newspaper headlines in films. If there's not a webpage devoted to that, there should be!

11. lostraven says:

    16 years ago at 9:50 am

    Someone pointed out the originals at thegothamtimes.com
    but there are - of course - more links. Reading the text
    of the original news story shows another website that
    is valid:

    http://www.wearetheanswer.org/

    I'm sure there are many more examples. I'll dig around a bit.

    -Shawn

12. zapevaj says:

    15 years ago at 11:48 pm

    Approximately half of the population of Chicago worked on that film.