However, if the reason for your doubts stems from the fact that 10% answered your poll in the affirmative, you should reread the New Scientist excerpt that was posted. If you're still convinced it's odd, go take a stats-for-social-scientists class.
Now, the folks who answered 7 or 8, I want to see pictures just for curiosity. The folks who answered 0 or 1, I want to see pics for proof. And the 5 people who claim they've gotten it pierced, I want to see pics because I've had piercers tell me I couldn't get mine done.
I'm actually surprised that the results came out to close to the real percentage, but that's because I think that people who answer polls are a bunch of lying, lying liars. Or furries. Lying, lying liar furries.
I'm surprised you trust any result from the poll. I never trust any Internet poll! It looks like people are posting their moles instead of third nipples too. Success!
I've got an underdeveloped third nipple which looks like a little bruise on my chest, but a dermatologist confirmed that it is indeed an 'accessory nipple', as he called it. since it is not a proper nipple I didn't answered the poll, because it's not two and it's not three.
You're not getting a photo, but mine are along the same lines as oracolodeifont, along the "milk line" as it's apparently loosely named, on my chest (the line goes down from the nipples, arching inwards a bit then out again). Apparently many people get little nipplettes along that line. The smaller one is just a little pink dot, but it's obvious once you compare it to its slightly larger cousin on the other side, which does have a central nippley bit. Both tiny though and they don't get noticed unless I point them out.
I guess claiming they are nipples is a bit border-line. They definitely want to be nipples when they grow up, though.
I was going to post it in reply to the original post, but it turned out TERRIBLE, but since you insist, here it is: I'll show you in person some time if you really want. It's not really another nipple, but I certainly would have been burned as a witch for it in days of yore.When I was a baby it looked exactly like my real nipples. Of course, they grew while it stayed the same. It's directly under my left boob.
"Pics or it didn't happen", as the kids say.
something like that http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1231288
I'll post one when I find a camera.
However, if the reason for your doubts stems from the fact that 10% answered your poll in the affirmative, you should reread the New Scientist excerpt that was posted. If you're still convinced it's odd, go take a stats-for-social-scientists class.
Now, the folks who answered 7 or 8, I want to see pictures just for curiosity. The folks who answered 0 or 1, I want to see pics for proof. And the 5 people who claim they've gotten it pierced, I want to see pics because I've had piercers tell me I couldn't get mine done.
I'm actually surprised that the results came out to close to the real percentage, but that's because I think that people who answer polls are a bunch of lying, lying liars. Or furries. Lying, lying liar furries.
That, however, is a perfectly good reason to be doubtful.
Third Nipple Piercing gallery on bmezine
Thank you, I know what's on the menu for tonight's nightmares.
I'm surprised you trust any result from the poll. I never trust any Internet poll! It looks like people are posting their moles instead of third nipples too. Success!
I've got an underdeveloped third nipple which looks like a little bruise on my chest, but a dermatologist confirmed that it is indeed an 'accessory nipple', as he called it. since it is not a proper nipple I didn't answered the poll, because it's not two and it's not three.
and here it is (notice the furrier area on the other side of the chest. no 4th nipple, though).
That should be superfluous third nipple.
Damn it, Jamie. You should have had 2.5 as a possible answer!
You're not getting a photo, but mine are along the same lines as oracolodeifont, along the "milk line" as it's apparently loosely named, on my chest (the line goes down from the nipples, arching inwards a bit then out again). Apparently many people get little nipplettes along that line. The smaller one is just a little pink dot, but it's obvious once you compare it to its slightly larger cousin on the other side, which does have a central nippley bit. Both tiny though and they don't get noticed unless I point them out.
I guess claiming they are nipples is a bit border-line. They definitely want to be nipples when they grow up, though.
Yeah, I've got one too, and a small accessory nubbin on my right nipple. heh
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/01/13/the_odd_body_third_nipple/
I was going to post it in reply to the original post, but it turned out TERRIBLE, but since you insist, here it is:
I'll show you in person some time if you really want. It's not really another nipple, but I certainly would have been burned as a witch for it in days of yore.When I was a baby it looked exactly like my real nipples. Of course, they grew while it stayed the same. It's directly under my left boob.
i only see one nippled... Where's the others!!! ;)
Well if we're talking witches tits then I've got one on my back. But jamie's already made fun of so he doesn't need another photo.
Ya know, I answered '2', but after the results came out, I had to double-check. Darn.
i am particularly interested in the ones who answered less than 2...
I said 2, but after this discussion I have noticed I have two spots that might be underdeveloped spares.
http://zapevaj.livejournal.com/179267.html?thread=1546819#t1546819
And apparently Patricia has witnessed your answer to the piercing question.
I didn't see this post until now. Hold on a sec...
Believe me now?