Retrievr -- Allegedly, you draw a picture, and it shows you a page full of pictures on Flickr that resemble it. But no mattr how many times I tried to draw boobies, it kept showing me flowrs and cats.
Or coloured it in. It seems to pay more attention to the vaguely location and placement of colours than it does to what you actually drew. Approximating skin tone with that palatte might be difficult though...
I can't work out whether the letters missing from this are typos or cunning puns on "Flickr" - "mattr" and "flowrs" seem like the latter while "alegedly" seems like the former.
As far as I know, this is one of those ideas that seems clever but actually isn't useful in practice. There are very few image retrieval tasks where I know what the image I want looks like.
My sketch of boobies got a little better results.
Maybe if I'd drawn hands...
Or coloured it in. It seems to pay more attention to the vaguely location and placement of colours than it does to what you actually drew. Approximating skin tone with that palatte might be difficult though...
That sounds like some kind of challenge.
Yeah, the results aren't great. I think the sample's just small. Also, image recognition hasn't arrived yet.
Could you try finding a boobie pic and then drawing it to see if you can get it to match?
wow thats a pretty good drawing given the tools available.
if you use 'fleshy' colours, shapes you kind of get boobies...altough once the subject was about 2 months old andi just felt bad.
although why i'm trying to 'force boobies' at 6am is beyond me...
I can't work out whether the letters missing from this are typos or cunning puns on "Flickr" - "mattr" and "flowrs" seem like the latter while "alegedly" seems like the former.
Yes, I made a spelling mistake while making a spelling joke. I win at the internets.
YM "teh". HTH.
that made my day!
guess this stuff simply reads your mindwaves.
I drew boobies, and got this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/99796131@N00/62172891/
I did simple black n white boobies and got this
and this.
Adding color, I think, confused it a little more.
Just wanted to say: best "current music" joke ever
Lucky you, all I get is eyeballs.
As far as I know, this is one of those ideas that seems clever but actually isn't useful in practice. There are very few image retrieval tasks where I know what the image I want looks like.
Why bother putting effort in when others already do it for you?
Where did the past hour just go?
Web 2.0 is awesome. Domain name missing an 'e' + random photos grabbed from flickr = gazillions of $$ off of google ads. Woo!
I wasn't convinced that it was actually doing anything until I got this.
I drew:


and got:
I guess you get what you give.