| jwz | I am especially irritated that when in "harpy mode" the girl vampires did not have nipples |
| kiad | now that is a travesty | |
| jwz | I mean, put clothes on them if you must |
| but boobs without nipples are just icky and wrong |
| kiad | Were they like Lara Croft's movie poster nipples? |
| jwz | they were like "I am naked except I don't have nipples" nipples |
| they were like "THERE ARE NO NIPPLES HERE, NOTHING TO SEE MOVE ALONG" nipples |
| kiad | ok. that is spooky |
| jwz | they were "entirely unlike the batsuit" nipples |
| kiad | even the sphinxes in the neverending story had nipples |
| was that supposed to be part of the horror element? |
| jwz | I don't think so |
Comments are closed because this post is 19 years old.
that. is. really. freaky.
I was over at a friend's house earlier this evening, and a discussion about nipples came up... Nipples on all Batman suits, except for the women's suits. .. strange.
are nipples super important?
Lack of nipples is super distracting.
Also, yes, they are.
cock... it was an honest question trying to understand the way the mail brain is on the nipple issue.
Noses.
Well, none of the mail transfer agents I've asked
have expressed a preference one way or the other
regarding the presence or absence of nipples.
Never thought about it before, but come to think of it, this could be the reason we have been having so many issues with the Exchange server. I had always just attributed it to a crap MS implementation... but now I am wondering if it is because of my small nipples.
This reply could be interpreted to indicate that nipples and reading comprehension are equally important. Given the current state of the world, this may, in fact, be true. Given the state of half time entertainment at the Super Bowl, it is indicated that nipples are, in fact, MORE important than reading comprehension.
Damn. I started that paragraph feeling silly and sarcastic, and now I'm depressed.
I was more distracted by the bad acting of all the female parts. Actually, it seemed more like bad writing. It almost had that stereotyped comic-book feel, but they didn't quite make it, and instead it was just corny.
However, Frankenstein's monster was awesome. Especially his sparking tesla-coil brain. Wonderfully old-school.
i thought only the minor characters were at all good (i.e. igor and the friar).
I hated them both, but I usually find sidekicks despicable.
they at least had identifiable character development - unlike the main characters - oddly.
Igor is fugly.
Or so I heard.
Not in anime. Their boobs may be twice the size of their head, but no nipples. :(
What are you watching, then? Quite a bit of the stuff I watch has nipples. Then again, I watch a lot of hentai...
I havent seen this, but from the preview I was shocked by the fact that he had a SEMI-AUTOMATIC CROSSBOW.
WTF? Have you ever tried to reload a crossbow? It takes like 2 minutes, and it certainly doesnt recock and reload itself.
Did they explain that away somehow?
That was bad enough. But no nipples? Thats a fucking travesty! No way am I seeing this now!
Yes, they explained that, as follows: "My name is Bond, James Bond." Explanation ends.
We should go out and protest outside the theaters. Maybe we'll get on CNN.
"What do we want? NIPPLES! When do we want it? NOW!"
At the very least you should send mail to the FCC demanding more nipples.
"They are anatomically incorrect! How do I explain that to my child?"
hmmm...so does s/he have long hair or short hair?
Personally, I wouldn't take my child (3 years old) to see this because he'd be all hyped up on Action Movie Adrenaline for the next six months, jumping around attacking "monsters", etc.
I mean, he's still role-playing the last Zelda game, and we finished playing that about three months ago. Although it's pretty funny when we're out in public and he's referring to people as monsters, or his princess.
I've got to get me a toddler, they sound fun.
He's remarkably hilarious; I told my wife that if I'd known how funny he'd be, I would've been pushing to have one earlier...
The only thing that bothers me about young children is the fact that their energy level long outlasts mine. After I want to stop playing and sit down they are still going 1000mph.
Now I understand why people have children when they're young. I couldnt imagine being able to keep up with that kind of energy level in middle age.
Put them to work on a mousewheel. It'll be like your very own Matrix!
I view it as a forced exercise regimen. I'll stay in better shape and (hopefully) avoid that middle-aged beer gut that 30-ish men start to develop.
Also, it's a bit weird that a post about the lack of vampire harpy nipples in Van Helsing has developed into a discussion of the merits of toddlers. ;-)
Hey, Mammaries... suckling.. babies, it makes sense. But you're right :)
i was way more disturbed by the fact that he didn't really kill much with the stupid thing. if you're going to make up an impossible weapon, at least make it impossibly effective, sheesh.
also, when trying to create a super bad-ass action hero, it is generally best to let him kill more than 4 or 5 things.
WHAT? He doesnt kill stuff? Oh this just keeps getting worse.
Tell me that when he finally does kill something its really bloody. Cause if they just evaporate video-game style, I'm gonna fucking puke.
ummmm....the only one i can think of as being at all bloody then turned into an evaporation.
it was definitely less satisfying than Underworld...and considering how mediocare THAT was, you get the picture.
He has a monk who is his version of Q and it isn't really a crossbow, it just looks like one - it uses pressurized gas to fire the bolts.
Got it. James bond kills monsters.
-a FRIAR-
"you try to get igor, igor get you!"
I was shocked by the fact that he had a SEMI-AUTOMATIC CROSSBOW.
Semi-Automatic? It was fully automatic! Does that answer your question?
I thought not.
*blink* *stare* *blink*
Your usericon is seriously freaking me out.
I aim to please.
(Shoot to kill)
Consider me jumping on the bandwagon.
Your usericon is seriously freaking me out.
It seemed to have some sort of propulsion device in the handle. Looked kinda like a CO2 cartridge or something...
This is assuming IRC...
That would go really well with my nuclear powered trebuchet.
Rented it a while back, fell asleep after about 20 minutes. It sucked. Don't bother with it at all.
Okay, sorry for saying this like... years after the comment came by after I threaded through not even sure where I was going, but...
There is such a thing as a repeating crossbow that can indeed fire on a semi-automatic basis. It wouldn't look anything like the thing he had in the movie, no, but it does exist. The Chinese used lever-action crossbows that had a box magazine where a single pull of the lever would load the crossbow, draw the string, and fire and still leave the thing in a state where you only had to pull the lever again to repeat. They were fairly small crossbows, but they were perfectly functional.
Well, at least she's wearing a watch so that she doesn't, y'know, lose track of time.
Without nipples, breasts are pointless! (Har.)
HAHAHAHA
Nipples hell. When do vampires shave?
Nipples are required.
There is no exemption form for nipples.
maybe they don't nurse their young or want to attract cock?
so you saying the movie sucks then?
Not only that, but the texture they mapped onto the bodies with their neat-o keen CGI machine thingies is a flatbed scan of the skin of a catfish.
I liked it.
For everyone who was disappointed with the lack of nipples, just consider it a fair trade for not having to see Dracula/Wolfman schlong.
A glans with fangs? A furry shaft? Big deal.
hahah- i opened the links and saw that i had also commented on the "freakishly misplaced" nipples in 2003- and gee- aren't i a comedian
I was dragged to see this movie after having five sake bombers consisting of the aforementioned sake and 63.3 centiliter bottles of Kirin Ichiban.
So, of course, I was in quite the proper frame of mind to enjoy it. Unfortunately, however, I don't remember a single bit.
Unfortunately, you say...
Unfortunately because I probably would have enjoyed it, being as I was totally fucking drunk. I wasn't exactly in a rational state of mind, hah.
THERE ARE NO NIPPLES HERE, NOTHING TO SEE MOVE ALONG
I think that you have just supplied the tag line for my next MEAT t-shirt. ;)
oh. mah. gawd.
Given how buttfuckingly cold it looks in the mountains of Transylvania, and the propensity for nipples to embarassingly harden when it does get that cold, perhaps this lack of nipples is actually explainable by genetic mutation. Or they could have frozen their nipples off, and the tits are next.
I mean, look how white their skin is; imagine what shade of beetroot red they'll turn when they blush, when someone points out how pointy their nipples are all of a sudden! That'd look positively blood-like! Which wouldn't be that great a survival trait in the land of vampires...
You probably wouldn't like I Went Down, then. They removed a girl's nipples in post, apparently to get a 15 cert in the UK instead of an 18. The end result is freakishly wrong, despite being onscreen for mere seconds. (other than that it's a pretty good flick)
The puppies in 101 Dalmations didn't have assholes.
Somewhere on a shelf in Hollywood is an unused container of puppy assholes. Right next to the unused container of harpy nipples.
That's a rather disturbing mental image.
Now imagine that container falling into the wrong hands! I can just see the devastation caused by an asshole-and-nipple bomb going off in a crowded subway station...
Like a gorilla fucking a nipple factory?
God damn that movie was a trainwreck.
A pack of my friends over at ILM worked on it and kept bitching about how bad it was, which I normally take with a grain of salt, we all hate what we're working on by the time it's ready for release...
But holy shit. People were actually walking out of the theatre.
Vampire Barbie!
the wookie with the cookies...
man, whatever happened to that band?
Since when have chicken breasts had nipples?