Joan Jett on Rolling Stone

Dear Rolling Stone,

I tried to find some cleverly worded way to express my disgust with your "Women in Rock" issue, but what i have to say is really quite simple: You guys are completely retarded.

<LJ-CUT text=" --More--( 5%) ">

By RS standards, Rock is no longer a style of music but a trendy costume to be whipped up by expensive stylists and slapped onto the latest pop tart barbie doll. Give a girl some tight pants and a spiky bracelet and POOF! She ROCKS!

Your poor choice of cover girls and featured artists brings to mind the Sports Illustrated swimsuit editions. There is nothing necessarily wrong with the breast-baring models inside..but we all understand that they have NOTHING TO DO WITH SPORTS--Which just might be offensive to women who are interested in sports or who might even be (gasp) real athletes.

Yes, Britney has a talented stylist and yes, somebody gave Shakira a Guns & Roses t-shirt to wear..but they ARE NOT NOW NOR WILL THEY EVER BE ROCK.

Maybe it's naive of me to expect any glimmer of rock'n'roll credibility OR respect for women from a magazine whose cover shot is regularly a naked underweight actress. The thing is , I AM a woman musician with a rock band, and as we all are I am STARVED for any little crumb of recognition that real women rockers might be thrown. So like a sucker I find myself short another five bucks ..and pissed enough to write my first letter to an editor. Avril Lavigne gets some studded accessories from Hot Topic so now she's "upholding the brazen tradition of teenage outrage"???!! Are you SERIOUS? And could someone please explain to me why people keep insisting on referring to PINK as rock? Wasn't she doing the white girl hip hop thing a minute ago? Yeah, she performed on the Aerosmith tribute show --big deal..she was on the Janet Jackson tribute show just before that--Whatever's trendy. WHO CARES. She's a Spice Girl reject...but I digress.

Jewel and Mandy friggin' Moore have full page features as Rock Icons...Meanwhile Joan Jett gets one line. ONE LINE. Joan Jett & the Blackhearts, who have never stopped touring, recently did 10 days in the Middle East playing for the troops stationed in Afghanistan. In AFGHANISTAN, Joan would come onstage wearing a birkha, which she ripped off and stomped on before blazing through the purest and nastiest rock show ANYWHERE. But even in the RS WOMEN IN ROCK issue, a story like that gets ONE SENTENCE on the bottom of the last page of Random Notes.

Britney's Rock credentials? Well, she butchers the song "I Love Rock'n'Roll" on her latest record, and when asked about it the genius replies "Well, I've always loved Pat Benatar." And SHE is your Rock issue cover girl?? You should be REALLY embarrassed.

Sleater Kinney was the only rock group listed on the cover..and they got only half a page. Ashanti, the r&b back up singer who can't seem to do anything without "featuring Jah Rule," has two pages.

What about the Donnas? The Yeah Yeah Yeahs? The Distillers? A mag like RS has the power to shine important light on groups like these--instead they are afterthoughts, and that valuable spotlight is wasted on the same overexposed pop princesses WHO HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ROCK.

In your own letter from the editor you have the hypocritical balls to say "rock radio won't touch female artists, while the pop factory keeps churning out soundalike clones, and ambitious musicians with something to say find themselves left out in the cold."

The pages that follow those words are a blatant display that Rolling Stone magazine is happily working for the factory now too.

If the issue had been called "Women in Music"..or maybe "Some Cute Girls with Top 10 Records out Right Now"..I would have no beef with it. Corny as it may sound, ROCK is something which is still meaningful and even sacred to some of us. Use the word "rock" in bold letters next to a picture of Britney Fucking Spears, and you're turning your whole publication into a joke...and an offensive joke at that.

Joan Jett


9 Responses:

  1. bdu says:

    While I agree with the content of the message, she could have better served her cause by not listing herself and her band as an example of a group deserving of more coverage.

    • spoonfeeding says:

      I was also a little thrown by her 3rd person praise of herself and her awesome performances. Other than that, rock on.

      • zapevaj says:

        Apparently, Jett is not the author. I emailed her fan club for clarification, and they said, "Please know that Joan did NOT write that letter. It was written by another performer who lists Joan as one of her influences. This performer has been a LONG time Joan Jett fan." They didn't specify who DID write it, though.

    • that bugged me a bit upon first read, but i think the claim was pretty legit. not necessarily because joan jett is that -significant-, but because she's so much more obvious of a choice to any idiot than britney spears or pink.

      besides, i think it gave it a bit more personal credibility; i.e., "i'm not just writing this to be an whiney feminist bitch; i personally have been legitimitely wronged by this article."

  2. baconmonkey says:

    "Rock" is a funny term.
    it's always been co-opted by fluffy pop.
    look at the 50s.
    Compare Jerry Lee Lewis and *old* elvis with "Rock around the Clock", or any of the other 50's pop-rock tunes.

    The same happened to Jazz. It was originally a drug-fuelled black-man's style of music, which was quickly sanitized by uptight-white men, and even distorted so far to become Aeorbics music - "Jazzercise".

    Now Jazz is elevator music, and "Rock" hasn't even pretended to be dangerous in at least a decade.

    although one could argue that rock hasn't existed since the 60's, because Rock, in it's earliest incarnations had a very heavy shuffle feel.

    • ivorjawa says:

      Guns 'N Roses was the last rock band. They rocked hard, they burned out quickly, Appetite for Destruction is one of the top 100 albums of all time, they pissed of everybody's parents, they had the drug problems and the supermodel girlfriends and the overproduced, yet still competent later albums ... they only place they didn't succeed in being the ultimate rock band is they're all still alive!
      If they'd managed to kill themselves in a spectacular way -- If Axl Rose had spontaneously combusted on stage, taking out the first 20 rows of audience, for instance -- then, they would have been perfect.

  3. darrad79 says:

    I agree totally with these comments. I dont know if this was an actual letter FROM Joan Jett but I couldnt agree more with the comments.
    Serious music lovers and musicians stopped reading Rolling Stone a long time ago.