"'Advanced' metazoan life of the form we now know, i.e. organisms with cell specialization and organ differentiation, was preceded by colonies of eukaryotic cells in which cellular cooperation was fairly rudimentary, consisting of networks of adhering cells exchanging information chemically, and forming self-organized assemblages with only a moderate division of labor," they write.According to Lineweaver, this suggests that cancer is an atavism, or an evolutionary throwback.
“We think that the tumours that develop in cancer patients today take the same form as these simple cellular structures did more than a billion years ago,” he said.
In a way, the genes that controlled this early multi-cellular form of life are like a computer operating system's 'safe mode', and when there are failures or mutations in the more recent genes that manage the way cells specialise and interact to form the complex life of today, then the earlier level of programming takes over.
Their notion is in contrast to a prevailing theory that cancer cells are 'rogue' cells that evolve rapidly within the body, overcoming the normal slew of cellular defences.
However, Davies and Lineweaver point out that cancer cells are highly cooperative with each other, if competing with the host's cells. This suggests a pre-existing complexity that is reminiscent of early multicellular life.
They also point out that cancers' manifold survival mechanisms are predictable, and unlikely to emerge spontaneously through evolution within each individual in such a consistent way.
The good news is that this means combating cancer is not necessarily as complex as if the cancers were rogue cells evolving new and novel defence mechanisms within the body.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Adolf Osborne on How to make the world's most impractical shot glass
- Landa on How to make the world's most impractical shot glass
- drew w. on Brodustrial: WWJD?
- Marc Moskowitz on How to make the world's most impractical shot glass
- Jeff on Brodustrial: WWJD?
- woods on How to make the world's most impractical shot glass
- MZ MegaZone on How to make the world's most impractical shot glass
- tom on Billionaire douchebag renounces US citizenship to save 3% on his taxes.
- 205guy on Billionaire douchebag renounces US citizenship to save 3% on his taxes.
- Dennis Nezic on Billionaire douchebag renounces US citizenship to save 3% on his taxes.
Archives
- 2012 (366)
- 2011 (775)
- October 2011 (72)
- September 2011 (62)
- August 2011 (70)
- July 2011 (53)
- June 2011 (84)
- May 2011 (62)
- April 2011 (67)
- March 2011 (103)
- February 2011 (42)
- January 2011 (31)
- December 2010 (50)
- November 2010 (52)
- October 2010 (57)
- September 2010 (51)
- August 2010 (51)
- July 2010 (46)
- June 2010 (57)
- 2010 (725)
- 2009 (590)
- 2008 (519)
- 2007 (374)
- 2006 (505)
- 2005 (578)
- 2004 (524)
- 2003 (634)
- 2002 (496)
It is interesting that some people thought that cancer was a gain in information as opposed to a loss of information. I only graduated in 2005 but cancer was always described as a loss of cell cycle regulation instead of a gain of some new information.
I think the competing theory is loss of cell cycle regulation followed by rapid evolution of rudimentary cooperation.
I'd always kind of assumed it was that way. Oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes and the regulatory networks between them, including apoptotic mechanisms, are numerous and rooted in metazoan genomes. The pathways which can lead to cancer are not an aberration per se; they are the ancient foundations upon which modern metazoan life has been built.